I'll Never Go To Restaurant Week Again!

It seems like everywhere you turn these days, someone’s having a restaurant week. Chester County had one earlier this year. Philadelphia has them several times a year, including two consecutive weeks in September (12-24, not including Saturday, of course), and the reboot of Main Line Restaurant Week is slated for the week of September 27th.
The reason I won’t be participating in any of these Restaurant Weeks, or any others for that matter, is simple: They aren’t a good deal. It’s three courses for $30, you think – how could it not be a good deal? Well, consider the following:
You don’t need that much food. Do you order an appetizer, entree and dessert for yourself when you go out to eat? I’m a big guy with a big appetite, but I still don’t do that. When going out as a couple, sharing an appetizer and dessert along with an entree is PLENTY of food — in fact, even that, when paired with a few slices of bread, can be too much. When it comes to RW, I resist the temptation to look at a menu to see how much I’d be saving if I bought three courses at their regular price, because I’d never do that. Instead, I compare the “deal” to what I’d order if it wasn’t RW, and quite often it costs less, or only a few bucks more.
Let’s review Nectar, for example, a popular local restaurant and surely one that will be packed during Restaurant Week. If you order the three most expensive things on the RW menu from their regular menu — Tuna Tartar, Grilled Salmon and the Nectar Valrhona Torte — it’d cost $48pp (vs. $40 during RW). So yes, you’d save money versus buying those things on a regular night. (If you order the Moo Sho Chicken — which, interestingly, is Moo Shoo Duck on the regular menu — or the vegetarian dish, on the other hand, you’d be lucky to get to the $40pp cost of the RW menu.) But this doesn’t change the fact that it is more food than I’d normally order… unless, of course, the portions are considerably smaller than on a normal night, which, though I can’t say for sure is done by any restaurant in particular, is a common, somewhat underhanded tactic often used with these promotions.
The other major problem with Nectar’s offer (and with most offers) is that it is a limited menu. I wouldn’t order any of the RW options were I to eat there tonight. This doesn’t mean they don’t sound tasty — other items on the menu are simply more appealing. Here’s what I would get: we’d start with the chicken curry dumplings for our shared appetizer ($7.5), pick the short ribs ($27) and tea-smoked venison ($34) as entrees, and finish off by sharing their signature donut dessert ($9). This would cost us a grand total of $77. If you’re not keeping score, that’s $3 less than we’d pay for the RW menu, AND we got to pick the most appealing items (to us) from the full menu!
This reminds me of the last time I patronized a local establishment during Restaurant Week. It was my dad’s birthday, and it also happened to be Restaurant Week, so we put a group together and headed down to El Vez in Center City. It didn’t take us long to realize that the restaurant week special menu contained the most boring, straightforward choices they offered, and that if we really wanted to enjoy our experience, we were going to have to ditch the $30 deal. It was a special occasion, so we went for it: We shared a bunch of appetizers, each got entrees and shared a dessert or two. Some people spent more, some spent less. At the end of the meal, despite having gone way off our original script, we had spent only $32pp on food — a mere $2 over the restaurant week “deal”.
This isn’t to say it’s impossible to find a good deal during Restaurant Week. They surely do exist — but they are also more the exception than the rule, and it will certainly take extra effort to find them. Combine this with the fact that the RW buzz will make reservations harder to get, and likely make the restaurants more crowded than usual (which can lead to spotty service), and this Restaurant Week concept doesn’t seem so appealing.
Maybe you like Restaurant Week — maybe it’s a way for you to try new places, or get a chance to visit a place you otherwise couldn’t afford. I certainly hold nothing against those who enjoy it. Just do me a favor and make sure the “deal” that you are supposedly getting is actually a deal, and not just a way to rook you into spending your hard-earned cash on smaller portions and already overpriced drinks.
Do you LOVE or HATE restaurant week? Tell us why below.
P.S. If you’re a RW hater too, you might be interested in Avalon’s “Non-Restaurant Week” promotion.
September 14, 2010 @ 8:36 am
your column, website,and your unsubstantiated reviews are full of negativity. In these difficult times, restaurants are trying anything they can to maintain the status quo, and bring in business. For a website that would seem to be here to promote the local dining community, it appears not much more than a venue to trash, and a opportunity for readers who watch “Top Chef” and Iron Chef” to act like skilled food critic in which they are not. Go away please.
September 14, 2010 @ 1:36 pm
Wow…pretty harsh. You are correct, these are difficult economic times. As such my husband and I are watching our “dining dollars”. This website has been an excellent forum for consumers to share their opinions and experiences..good AND bad. I don’t think anyone who posts on this site pretends to be a skilled food critic…just folks who like a decent meal and service.
September 15, 2010 @ 8:42 am
What review were you reading? I read one where someone suggested that restaurant week wasn’t a very good value. Who put a burr up your butt?
October 3, 2010 @ 6:48 am
So why would a person who hates this site and thinks it is so harmful to the industry spend so much time here bothering to attack it? Makes no sense at all. Time would be better spent building a competing site and posting what YOU think is true and helpful.
September 14, 2010 @ 7:22 pm
I have to say, I thinktwice that week. I hope it becomes an annual or bi-annual event. Takes me to places I would otherwise not go to visit. Buon appitete restaurant week is brilliant, who was the mastermind behind this promotion?? Everyone I know is talking about and eating out at these restaurants. I have two different dates already reserved. It takes me to places I would otherwise not visit.
September 16, 2010 @ 4:00 pm
cmon skip…read through the site’s listed restaurants. count how many bashes vs praises…it’s heavilly favored towards the negative here. I love blogging, but this website has no biz reviewing or allowing reviews when it is so infrequently updated. Look I’ll stay away too, but the last opinion of the content manager was to me overtly biased against an event sponsered by their main competitor who they have no affiliation with. Look into that a bit…
September 16, 2010 @ 4:55 pm
Dave, I seem to recall a long rant from you back in April calling out Nectar for their absurd booze markup. How is that any different from what you are criticizing here?
I’d also like to see some actual data to support your argument that it is “heavily favored towards the negative here”. Please, feel free to try.
September 16, 2010 @ 5:37 pm
Maybe the reviews here slant towards the negative because the vast majority of restaurants on the main line serve sub par food with horribly unprofessional service. Not all mind you… but a lot. This comes from someone who has eaten at every single restaurant on the main line from bala through west chester and surrounding areas (some places 2 or 3 times as they have changed names, owners or concepts). There are only about 5 places I return to again and again for the food.
September 17, 2010 @ 4:44 am
point taken, I did say that. Food is wonderful there though, but yes the drinks are unfairly prized.
As for the reviews..your 5 year old review of Christophers, the past ones of Blush, mentions of Verdad..the endless line of angry customers to Teresas, I remeber a review calling Merideths”disgusting” which is not true as I hope you would agree, but it was there. Look I’ll back off, cause this is your work. But some of these people who work at these places have become my friends, and they do not get chances to explain the difficult and unable to please people who feel entitled to the perfect dish.
September 17, 2010 @ 5:06 am
I don’t want to belabor this point, but let’s clarify the difference between MLDs reviews and the reviews of our readers. Yes, we did give negative reviews to Christopher’s and Blush. We had horrific experiences at both restaurants that could simply not be overlooked. The great thing about this site, however, is that we allow readers to agree or disagree with us right on the page. You think we’re way off? Tell us. We’ll post it. Most of the time, I’ve noticed, our readers tend to agree with us more than they disagree. But not always.
Speaking of which, the other negative things you point out (Verdad, Teresa’s and Meridith’s) are reader comments. We can’t (nor would we want to) only post positive reader comments; what would be the point of having them? We’ll remove personal attacks and blatant lies sure, but if someone doesn’t like a place they have the same right to post that as someone who had a great experience. That’s the point of sites like this.
Instead of looking at it as unqualified people posting (what qualifies you to review a restaurant anyway?), the restaurant industry would be better off treating every customer like Craig LeBan and making sure they are putting out a consistently great product. If you do that, you’ll all surely benefit from customer reviews on the web.
September 17, 2010 @ 5:09 am
Also, we allow and encourage chefs / restaurant owners to respond to customers here on the site (assuming you can do it constructively). I’ve seen it happen several times and when the chef is willing to admit mistakes and stay positive, it can be a great PR move for the business.
September 17, 2010 @ 9:36 am
I agree – the Rsst wk promotion is not a good deal. I also agree that I find the MLD reviews fair. I don’t get the bad review for Christopher’s. but I did not find it (or any other MLD review) to be spiteful or vengeful. Most of the opinions are explained out well – some of the specifics regarding service may be a little picky but that is all I can think of.
September 23, 2010 @ 1:18 pm
Well, I went to Ruth Chris’s last night and am not happy at all. WAY WAY to expensive, cold food lousy service. Wondering who else brings your winw to the table in a carafe and dumps it in your glass? TACKY
October 4, 2010 @ 10:42 am
to MLD – we went to Azie on Main Saturday because on paper they appeared to have one of the better values ($20 pp) for the money and it did not disappoint. We were all satsified with our portions. But I have to admit, one of the diners at the table next to us got the kobe beef & hot rock and it looked and smelled real good!
October 13, 2010 @ 6:05 am
I understand both sides of the argument about RW. On one hand, you have the people that say “Hey, it’s a good opportunity to get out and try something new for a reasonable price.” On the other, you have those that say it makes for a sub-par dining experience for a given restaurant because of a limited menu and overcrowded restaurant/overworked staff. I’ve participated in RW a few times (not ML RW). One of the couples I’ve gone with really won’t go downtown unless it’s for RW. I’ve tried to encourage them for other times, but they complain about parking (not just downtown, they complain about parking everywhere), or having to work the next day, or that it’s too cold. Overall, I’d say it’s really up to the consumer to decide, but they really should understand what they’re paying for and what they may be missing by choosing that limited menu. If they’re okay with that, then by all means, please join other diners for RW and have a good time!